Tender irregularities hamper infrastructure development


Tender irregularities hamper infrastructure development
infrastructure development
The members of the Built Environment Professions (BEP) grouping collectively have voiced their concerns pertaining to infrastructure bottlenecks or lack of infrastructure delivery, as well as inadequacies in mechanisms to procure their professional services.

The BEP grouping consists of the Association of Construction Health and Safety Management; Association of Construction Project Managers; Association of South African Quantity Surveyors; Consulting Engineers South Africa; Institute for Landscape Architecture in South Africa; South African Black Technical and Allied Careers Organisation; and the South African Institute of Architects.

While these professionals welcome the government’s revised infrastructure budget in terms of the 18 Strategic Integrated Projects as a positive move, they argue that the barrier to infrastructure delivery lies in the lack of transparency during the procurement processes related to the allocation of professional services and tenders. This manifests itself in the form of obscure decision-making processes and unequal distribution of professional services, bolstered by a high potential for corruption and coupled with weak accountability mechanisms and lack of scrutiny over allocation of public funds.

The BEP grouping believes that one of the mechanisms to curb possible corruption is by having greater transparency in the whole procurement cycle, and construction contracts awarded should be openly published – which will also increase accountability by infrastructure stakeholders.
It further believes that the government must include a compulsory evaluation and monitoring unit tasked to, among others, ensure professionals and departments comply with legislation and offers made with respect to skills, and skills transfer made during the bid stage.

Matching price with quality and preference: professional service providers must be appointed based on a best weighting for price, quality and preference. Best practice in the procurement of professional services is achieved by using a mutually agreed selection methodology (within the legal procurement frameworks) that does not detract from the economic and skills transformation objectives of the government.

The BEP grouping is calling for a review of the scoring system for procurement, and is of the opinion that the rules that dictate the procurement of general goods and services should be amended to include a specific section that deals with the procurement of professional services. Therefore, a new set of procurement policy systems must be developed for procure BEP and associated services.

It is vital that the government and the BEP work together to create a conducive, sustainable, non-exclusive procurement environment with definitive transformation objectives to ensure efficient project service delivery as well as the sustainable development and growth of the built environment industry.
comments powered by Disqus

This edition

Issue 29


TPM_Editor Old boy brings new life to Joburg school buildings using Corobrik’s quality face bricks https://t.co/pC2VbQr96c https://t.co/FFVtCmd3Q7 4 months - reply - retweet - favorite

TPM_Editor Global pump manufacturer obtains level 1 B-BBEE certification https://t.co/BzoTAQ4xtL https://t.co/38kRVsMdrg 8 months - reply - retweet - favorite

TPM_Editor IDT works on Tshwane inner city heritage project for Public Works https://t.co/jZVBLXqzNa https://t.co/oVAHEg3q2z 8 months - reply - retweet - favorite